KnowledgeTrend Research Network
KnowledgeTrend JournalFunding & Careers
KnowledgeTrend
☰ Menu
HomePapersResearchersResearch LabsProjectsGroupsFunding & CareersScholarshipsBlogJournalTools
Sign inCreate account
LE
Unclaimed author profile

Lesley Stewart

· University of York

Is this your research profile?

Create or sign in to your KnowledgeTrend account to claim this page. After the claim, this same profile URL and its linked publications will belong to your account. Claiming does not automatically grant a verified badge.

Create account and claim this profile Sign in to claim
4Linked publications
0Citations
0h-index
0i10-index

Metrics are calculated from publications currently linked to this profile.

Researcher overview

About

Lesley Stewart is a registered researcher in their academic field.

Research output

Recent Publications

4 research works linked to this profile

▤
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews, Traumatic Brain Injury Research, Delphi Technique in Research · 2021 · BMJ

The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

Matthew J. Page, Joanne E. McKenzie, Patrick M. Bossuyt, Isabelle Boutron, Tammy Hoffmann, Cynthia D. Mulrow, Larissa Shamseer, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Elie A. Akl, Sue Brennan, Roger Chou, Julie Glanville, Jeremy Grimshaw, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Manoj M. Lalu, Tianjing Li, Elizabeth Loder, Evan Mayo‐Wilson, Steve McDonald, Luke A. McGuinness, Lesley Stewart, James Thomas, Andrea C. Tricco, Vivian Welch, Penny Whiting, David Moher

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.

ViewRead PDFDownload
▤
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, Delphi Technique in Research · 2019 · BMJ

RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

Jonathan A C Sterne, Jelena Savović, Matthew J. Page, Roy G. Elbers, Natalie Blencowe, Isabelle Boutron, Christopher J Cates, Hung‐Yuan Cheng, Mark Corbett, Sandra Eldridge, Jonathan Emberson, Miguel A. Hernán, Sally Hopewell, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Daniela R. Junqueira, Peter Jüni, Jamie J Kirkham, Toby J Lasserson, Tianjing Li, Alexandra McAleenan, Barnaby C Reeves, Sasha Shepperd, Ian Shrier, Lesley Stewart, Kate Tilling, Ian R. White, Penny Whiting, Julian P. T. Higgins

Assessment of risk of bias is regarded as an essential component of a systematic review on the effects of an intervention. The most commonly used tool for randomised trials is the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. We updated the tool to respond to developments in understanding how bias arises in randomised trials, and to address user feedback on and limitations of the original tool.

ViewRead PDFDownload
▤
Delphi Technique in Research, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, Meta-analysis and systematic reviews · 2018 · Annals of Internal Medicine

PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

Andrea C. Tricco, Erin Lillie, Wasifa Zarin, Kelly K. O’Brien, Heather Colquhoun, Danielle Levac, David Moher, Micah D.J. Peters, Tanya Horsley, Laura Weeks, Susanne Hempel, Elie A. Akl, Christine Chang, Jessie McGowan, Lesley Stewart, Lisa Hartling, Adrian Aldcroft, Michael G. Wilson, Chantelle Garritty, Simon Lewin, Christina Godfrey, Marilyn Macdonald, Étienne V Langlois, Karla Soares‐Weiser, Jo Moriarty, Tammy Clifford, Özge Tunçalp, Sharon E. Straus

Scoping reviews, a type of knowledge synthesis, follow a systematic approach to map evidence on a topic and identify main concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps. Although more scoping reviews are being done, their methodological and reporting quality need improvement. This document presents the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist and explanation. The checklist was developed by a 24-member expert panel and 2 research leads following published guidance from the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network. The final checklist contains 20 essential reporting items and 2 optional items. The authors provide a rationale and an example of good reporting for each item. The intent of the PRISMA-ScR is to help readers (including researchers, publishers, commissioners, policymakers, health care providers, guideline developers, and patients or consumers) develop a greater understanding of relevant terminology, core concepts, and key items to report for scoping reviews.

ViewRead PDFDownload
▤
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews, Delphi Technique in Research, Traumatic Brain Injury Research · 2015 · Systematic Reviews

Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement

PRISMA-P Group, David Moher, Larissa Shamseer, Mike Clarke, Davina Ghersi, Alessandro Liberati, Mark Petticrew, Paul Shekelle, Lesley Stewart

Systematic reviews should build on a protocol that describes the rationale, hypothesis, and planned methods of the review; few reviews report whether a protocol exists. Detailed, well-described protocols can facilitate the understanding and appraisal of the review methods, as well as the detection of modifications to methods and selective reporting in completed reviews. We describe the development of a reporting guideline, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015). PRISMA-P consists of a 17-item checklist intended to facilitate the preparation and reporting of a robust protocol for the systematic review. Funders and those commissioning reviews might consider mandating the use of the checklist to facilitate the submission of relevant protocol information in funding applications. Similarly, peer reviewers and editors can use the guidance to gauge the completeness and transparency of a systematic review protocol submitted for publication in a journal or other medium.

ViewRead PDFDownload